GOP Debate: Cain's Plan Will Sink Him

Wednesday, 19 Oct 2011 12:17 AM

By John LeBoutillier

  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
|  A   A  
  Copy Shortlink
After the GOP debate in Las Vegas Tuesday night, this is what Republican voters are looking for and have yet to find: a leader who presents a vision to us — the American people — of how he or she will reverse a widespread sense of national decline and then lead an American revival.

Instead, all we see are quibbling, unimaginative candidates who focus on small things instead of the biggest issue of all: how to inspire a dispirited American people and infuse them with a belief that America’s best days are not in the past.

On technical grades, Herman Cain withstood withering attacks on his 9-9-9 plan, but what might hurt him has now been established: an average taxpayer will pay more under his 9-9-9 plan than he pays now.

If that argument proves to be accepted as true, then Herman Cain’s popularity will begin to wane. He is so intertwined with his plan that, when that plan becomes less popular, so will he. (This happened in 1996 with Steve Forbes and his momentarily popular flat tax; as soon as the people looked at it and compared it with their current taxes, the flat tax — and Steve Forbes — dropped like a rock.)

However, Cain is an enormously refreshing candidate you cannot help but like. He is the repository of most tea party voters who like an out-of-the-box, non-politician.
Mitt Romney seemed a bit more petulant than his carefully controlled performances in the three recent debates. He clearly dislikes Rick Perry, even though Perry has flat-lined as a candidate and basically should be ignored.

But Romney couldn’t hold back and really tore into the lost-looking, in-over-his-head Texas governor. This exchange made Romney look like less of a man — and certainly less presidential.

Ron Paul continued to say things that previous GOP presidential candidates never have had the courage to say — especially about aid to Israel, closing foreign bases, not building a fence on our southern border, and the Occupy Wall Street protesters.

Newt Gingrich always does well in these debates because he breaks the format, critiques the questions — and at the end of this debate criticized all the other candidates for “quibbling.” He was — and is — right. You get to the White House by going big and high — not low and petty.

Michele Bachmann and Rick Santorum were almost invisible in this debate, and they have no impact on the race anymore. They have become vanity candidates who stay in the race through Iowa – and then disappear.

Conclusion: not the best debate for the Republican Party overall. We did not present a Reaganesque, positive, hopeful, visionary face to the American people.

© 2014 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Copy Shortlink
Around the Web
Join the Newsmax Community
Please review Community Guidelines before posting a comment.
>> Register to share your comments with the community.
>> Login if you are already a member.
blog comments powered by Disqus
Retype Email:
Zip Code:
Privacy: We never share your email.
Hot Topics
Follow Newsmax
Like us
on Facebook
Follow us
on Twitter
Add us
on Google Plus
Around the Web
Top Stories
You May Also Like

My Quick Debate Analysis

Wednesday, 03 Oct 2012 23:14 PM

These are my quick and spontaneous thoughts on tonight’s first presidential debate: . . .

The Ryan Pick: The Hand of God?

Monday, 13 Aug 2012 10:26 AM

Mitt Romney’s selection of Paul Ryan to be his running mate will not help Romney win the election. . . .

Is Romney Blowing Winnable Election?

Wednesday, 01 Aug 2012 13:22 PM

With 97 days to go, the 2012 presidential election remains Romney’s to lose. The deteriorating economy is President Obam . . .

Most Commented

Newsmax, Moneynews, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, NewsmaxWorld, NewsmaxHealth, are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved