'Life of Julia' Ad Pushes Nanny State

Thursday, 17 May 2012 11:15 AM

By Jackie Gingrich Cushman

  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
|  A   A  
  Copy Shortlink
As a child, I was a voracious reader, mostly of fiction. I would read during class, during lunch, during the bus ride. When I was reading, I was not part of my boring normal life, but part of a deeper, more compelling story.

Fiction has the ability to transport the reader into a different world. The same holds true for movies and television shows. Stories of all types capture our attention and imagination. Even news is told in story fashion. Sports coverage includes the backstories of the athletes to draw us into the narrative of the event.

When we talk, we trade information with friends, often through story form: "Let me tell you what," or, "Can you believe that?"

Even how we view our own lives is a storyline. More often we are the protagonists, the people who are battling against the forces of evil and becoming stronger and better through the process. According to Jonathan Gottschall, author of "The Storytelling Animal," "we are, as a species, addicted to story."

But not all stories are real. For instance: The Obama-Biden campaign recently rolled out a story about Julia, a made-up woman. Titled "The Life of Julia," it is billed as a way to "take a look at how President Obama's policies help one woman over her lifetime — and how Mitt Romney would change her story."

The moral of the story given to us at the end of the slide show is: "From cracking down on gender discrimination in healthcare costs to fighting for equal pay, President Obama is standing up for women throughout their lives."

The story promises a nanny state where the government is the one that makes sure people, in this case women, are cared for and happy.

In his newest book, "The Road to Freedom," Arthur Brooks, the president of the American Enterprise Institute, lays out the opposite moral argument. It is in favor of the free enterprise system and against government control.

The choice he describes is between two versions of America — one where "government will restart our economy with more stimulus, more taxes and more borrowing. Morally, the government holds the secret to fairness through more income redistribution and taxation of the wealthy. The government will lift up the poor and the disadvantaged. We need government programs in order to pursue our happiness." Think Julia.

The second version is the belief that "the key to our success lies in free enterprise — the system our Founders left us to maximize liberty, create individual opportunity, and reward entrepreneurship. Free enterprise creates the opportunity our ancestors came to America seeking — the opportunities that allowed them to pursue their happiness in a new land."

The opposite belief system from Obama-Biden and convincing to me (but then I'm a conservative).

Brooks writes that the argument for the free enterprise system must be based on what is moral to be won. "Free enterprise teaches us to earn success, not learn helplessness. It rewards merit, which is the fair thing to do. And in the end, it is the only system that can improve the lives of literally billions of poor people — here and around the world."

If Brooks is correct, then why is President Obama currently in the lead?

According to a Gallup poll released Tuesday, "56 percent of Americans think Barack Obama will win the 2012 presidential election, compared with 36 percent who think Mitt Romney will win."

This is in contrast to a poll released by Gallup last Thursday where "registered voters are more likely to say Mitt Romney, if elected president, would do a very good or good job of handling the economy than they are to say President Obama would, if re-elected — 61 percent vs. 52 percent."

Brooks' argument is right, and compelling, but the America people are responding to story more than the moral argument.

Gottschall noted in his book that "if you want a message to burrow into a human mind, work it into a story." Fiction is more than fiction; it is a way to teach morals. "In fact, fiction seems to be more effective at changing beliefs than nonfiction, which is designed to persuade through argument and evidence."

The moral of this column: Conservatives have to do more than make the moral argument; they have to be able to share stories, connect emotionally, and persuade through more than evidence and argument.

Jackie Gingrich Cushman is the co-author along with her father, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, of the book "5 Principles for a Successful Life: From Our Family to Yours." Read more reports from Jackie Gingrich Cushman — Click Here Now.

© Creators Syndicate Inc.

  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Copy Shortlink
Around the Web
Join the Newsmax Community
Please review Community Guidelines before posting a comment.
>> Register to share your comments with the community.
>> Login if you are already a member.
blog comments powered by Disqus
Zip Code:
Privacy: We never share your email.
Hot Topics
Follow Newsmax
Like us
on Facebook
Follow us
on Twitter
Add us
on Google Plus
Around the Web
Top Stories
You May Also Like

Obama Disregards Message of Midterms

Thursday, 13 Nov 2014 09:44 AM

In the week following the shellacking of his party in the midterm elections, one might think that President Barack Obama . . .

Now, It's About Governing, Not Politics

Thursday, 06 Nov 2014 10:06 AM

This is the chance for Republicans to reach out, be inclusive and ensure that all Americans can have a brighter future t . . .

After Elections, GOP Must Lead

Thursday, 30 Oct 2014 09:22 AM

The Republicans have an opportunity to set out a clear agenda and provide 2016 voters with a clear contrast between them . . .

Most Commented

Newsmax, Moneynews, Newsmax Health, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, and Newsmax World are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved