Tags: tax | afghan | war

Lawmakers: New Tax Should Pay for Afghan War

Friday, 20 Nov 2009 08:36 AM

Influential U.S. lawmakers called on Thursday for levying a new income tax to pay for the war in Afghanistan, warning its costs pose a mortal threat to efforts like a sweeping healthcare overhaul.

"Regardless of whether one favors the war or not, if it is to be fought, it ought to be paid for," said the a joint statement from the lawmakers, all prominent Democratic allies of President Barack Obama.

The proposed "Share The Sacrifice Act of 2010" came with Obama set to announce within weeks his decision on whether to send more US troops to fight the war, now in its ninth year.

Special: Get Sarah Palin’s New Book – Incredible FREE Offer — Click Here Now.

The group included House Appropriations Committee Chairman Dave Obey; Rep. John Murtha, who chair that panel's defense subcommittee; and House Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney Frank.

The proposal, a heavily symbolic measure seen as having next to no chance of becoming law, would impose a war surtax on income beginning in 2011 — though it would allow the president to delay implementation by one year upon deciding the US economy is too weak to sustain such a tax shift.

It also would exempt members of the U.S. military who have served in combat since the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist strikes, their families, and families of soldiers who died as a result of combat.

"The only people who've paid any price for our military involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan are our military families," the lawmakers said. "We believe that if this war is to be fought, it's only fair that everyone share the burden."

If the war is not paid for, its costs "will devour money that could be used to rebuild our economy by fixing our broken healthcare system, expanding educational opportunities and job training possibilities, attacking our long term energy problems and building stronger communities," they said.

The measure would create a three-tiered change in income tax with the goal of paying for all of the war's costs.

Couples earning up to $150,000 per year would see a 1 percent increase in their regular tax level, from 15 percent to 15.15 percent.

For those making between $150,000 to $250,000 a year or $250,000 or above, the president would have to set the rate increase high enough to pay for the remaining war costs, and in such a way that the middle-tier earners pay half what the top earners do.

The war costs roughly $68 billion a year, which would mean that the middle tier would see its rate rise from 28 percent to 29.5 percent, while the top would climb from 33 percent to 36.6 percent, according to a person familiar with the plan.

Copyright AFP. All rights reserved.


Around the Web
Join the Newsmax Community
Please review Community Guidelines before posting a comment.
>> Register to share your comments with the community.
>> Login if you are already a member.
blog comments powered by Disqus
Zip Code:
Privacy: We never share your email.
Hot Topics
Follow Newsmax
Like us
on Facebook
Follow us
on Twitter
Add us
on Google Plus
Around the Web
Top Stories
You May Also Like

Mali's Islamists Withdraw Cease-Fire Pledge

Friday, 04 Jan 2013 13:06 PM

Tens of thousands of Fatah supporters rallied in the Hamas stronghold of Gaza on Friday for the first time since they we . . .

Fmr. CIA Director Hayden: Iran Nuclear Crisis Gets 'Scarier'

Tuesday, 17 Jul 2012 18:11 PM

 . . .

Join Fmr. CIA Director for Special Iran Briefing, Assess the Danger

Friday, 13 Jul 2012 12:27 PM

 . . .

Most Commented

Newsmax, Moneynews, Newsmax Health, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, and Newsmax World are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved