Feingold Blames Obama For Loss Of Public Option

Monday, 21 Dec 2009 11:42 AM

By John Rossomando

Share:
A    A   |
   Email Us   |
   Print   |
   Forward Article  |
  Copy Shortlink
A prominent liberal Democrat lays blame for the Senate’s failure to pass the public option squarely on the shoulders of Barack Obama.

Sen. Russ Feingold, D-Wisc., says Obama’s apparent lack of will to aggressively lobby senators to support the public option ultimately led to its downfall in the Senate version, which will be voted on this week.

“I’ve been fighting all year for a strong public option. I continued that fight during recent negotiations, and I refused to sign on to a deal to drop the public option from the bill,” Feingold said in a press statement. “Unfortunately, the lack of support from the administration made keeping the public option an uphill struggle.”

Special: Get Sarah Palin’s New Book – Incredible FREE Offer -- Click Here Now.
The senator says he disagrees with the decision to remove the public option, and it eliminates $25 billion in savings from the $871 billion bill. He says he plans to insist on having the House-Senate conference committee reinsert the public option into the final bill after the Senate bill passes.

Although Feingold opposes the decision to eliminate the public option from the Senate bill, he says it stands as a marked improvement over the current healthcare situation.

“The bill significantly expands coverage and helps protect Wisconsinites from high costs and insurance company abuses, such as denying or restricting coverage based on pre-existing conditions,” Feingold said. “The bill also improves a flawed Medicare formula that denies Wisconsinites fair reimbursement rates, encourages the kind of low-cost, high-value care practiced in our state, increases access to home- and community-based long-term care.”

Feingold also claimed the Senate bill would reduce the deficit by $132 billion over the next decade; however, the Congressional Budget Office revised its initial estimate Sunday from the earlier number used by the senator, indicating deficit reductions from the bill would not kick in until after 2019.

A blog entry in the Huffington Post suggests although Obama may have avoided defending the public option for strategic reasons, it goes a long way to reinforcing the narrative about his “timidity” when it comes to his leadership.

© 2014 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

Share:
   Email Us   |
   Print   |
   Forward Article  |
  Copy Shortlink
Around the Web
Join the Newsmax Community
>> Register to share your comments with the community.
>> Login if you are already a member.
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
Email:
Retype Email:
Country
Zip Code:
 
Hot Topics
Follow Newsmax
Like us
on Facebook
Follow us
on Twitter
Add us
on Google Plus
Around the Web
You May Also Like

Mali's Islamists Withdraw Cease-Fire Pledge

Friday, 04 Jan 2013 13:06 PM

Tens of thousands of Fatah supporters rallied in the Hamas stronghold of Gaza on Friday for the first time since they we . . .

Fmr. CIA Director Hayden: Iran Nuclear Crisis Gets 'Scarier'

Tuesday, 17 Jul 2012 18:11 PM

 . . .

Join Fmr. CIA Director for Special Iran Briefing, Assess the Danger

Friday, 13 Jul 2012 12:27 PM

 . . .

Newsmax, Moneynews, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, NewsmaxWorld, NewsmaxHealth, are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

 
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved