Login or Register
Welcome , Settings |  Logout

Freedom Has Reasonable Constraints

Tuesday, 26 Jun 2012 10:58 AM

By Herbert London

Share:
More . . .
A    A   |
   Email Us   |
   Print   |
In a nation obsessed with creativity, freedom is the exalted position. For freedom gives meaning to our actions. Yet it is the defect of ideology to assume action is reducible to one simple principle, a uniquely explanatory element. In reality, freedom is a complex and composite affair.

While freedom is often reduced to choice — a means to achieve our goals — in cultural terms freedom is defined negatively, i.e., non-compulsion from without and self-determination from within.

However, freedom can exist in a culture with normative judgment and moral constraints. The newly liberated contend freedom means unbound without reference to ontological claims. But this is absurd. Freedom is defined by boundaries.

Camus, in The Stranger, maintained that there isn’t justice (read: freedom) without limits. Those who believe you are free to do whatever you like invariably strike the walls of licentiousness. Freedom is inhibited by responsibility, morality, and law. The focus on autonomous choice ends up with a normative account of the human good.

In this postmodern era the limits imposed by norms are continually questioned. Freedom is now seen extending further into the domain of practical reason (what is done), but also speculative reason (what might be done). This postmodern idea seeks to extend the prerogatives of self-determination into every aspect of our lives, including challenges to human dignity and religious concerns.

The reason why this is the case is that post-modernists find any normative account of human nature inherently dangerous. They wish to control every aspect of life whether it be the meaning of existence, the content of moral norms, religious claims, and human sexuality. But this liberal ideal of freedom leads to a willful ignorance of human nobility.

Thomas Aquinas noted that the knowledge of the good plays an essential role in the actions of freedom. This is consistent with a point made by Thomas Jefferson in the “Declaration of Independence” who argued for the free pursuit of human happiness bounded by a well understood idea of virtue.

This was not Benthamite utilitarianism: if happiness derives more pleasure than pain, it is desirable to pursue “the greatest good for the greatest number.” For Jefferson, it was the pursuit of happiness within the parameters of normative beliefs.

The exaggerated desire for freedom of indeterminate choice cannot be sated solely by the discipline of legitimate authority, albeit that is a necessary but insufficient condition for defining freedom. Ultimately the pursuit of truth, a deep vision into the human capacity — what James Q. Wilson described as “the inner morality” — is critical. Such a vision should address the complexities of our age, but also should resolve the difference between freedom’s past and its present postmodern state. Norms do change. However, their acceptance is more likely when they nourish our spiritual appetites.

The freedom unhinged from norms invariably leads to confusion and despair. Unlimited choice is a spiritual nightmare. And the darkness of confusion emerges when we are paralyzed by options beyond our understanding.

Yes, we want to be free, but only when that freedom results in personal enrichment. That enrichment is paradoxically found in limits, the very condition against which the postmodern liberationists marshal their energies.

Here is the irony of modern life: to be free we must recognize constraints. Even the artist challenging the barriers of the past must recognize the need for constraining techniques. The past always seizes us by the collar, reminding mankind that fulfillment through the use of choice puts us on a path tread before.

Ultimately, mankind cannot escape its basic nature and the real meaning of freedom within the contours of normative constraints.

Herbert London is president emeritus of Hudson Institute and author of the books "The Transformational Decade" (University Press of America) and "Decline and Revival in Higher Education" (Transaction Books). Read more reports from Herbert London — Click Here Now.












© 2013 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

Share:
More . . .
   Email Us   |
   Print   |
Around the Web
Join the Newsmax community.
Register to share your comments with the community. Already a member? Login
Note: Comments from readers do not necessarily reflect the viewpoint of Newsmax Media. While we attempt to review comments, if you see an inappropriate comment you can block it by rolling over the comment, clicking the down arrow and selecting "Flag As Inappropriate."
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
Email:
Country
Zip Code:
 
Hot Topics
Top Stories
Around the Web
You May Also Like

Hollowing Out the US Navy

Thursday, 03 Jan 2013 12:28 PM

From the time Alfred Mahan wrote his classic work on naval power at the beginning of the twentieth century to the presen . . .

Why Iran Won Last Middle East Conflict

Wednesday, 19 Dec 2012 11:10 AM

Although the truce between Gaza and Israel didn’t lead to an unequivocal result, Israeli officials said they destroyed m . . .

Nobel Peace Prize Is a Perverse Joke

Tuesday, 11 Dec 2012 13:48 PM

Just what is the Nobel Peace Prize committee up to? In giving the prize to the European Union (EU) the Norwegians compri . . .

 
 
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved