Democrats' Addiction to Spending Clear in 1099 Debate

Monday, 20 Sep 2010 12:13 PM

By Grover Norquist

  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
|  A   A  
  Copy Shortlink
From the ATR website.

Upon returning from recess, the Senate was captivated by two amendments to the small business lending bill. Passions flared not only because of the punitive impact each amendment would have, but because the legislation each side advocated for exemplified the ideological differences between Republicans and Democrats.

This proxy war was fought over the 1099 reporting requirements for small businesses that the Patient Protection and Affordability Care Act radically increases. While both Democrats and Republicans agree that 1099 reporting for all small businesses are unnecessary and burdensome, they have offered different remedies.

Representing the Democratic camp, Sen. Bill Nelson, D-Fla., proposed a tax hike on America’s five largest oil and natural gas producers. Sen. Nelson would use the newly garnered revenue to exempt some small businesses from 1099 reporting.

In the GOP corner, Sen. Mike Johanns, R-Neb., offered an amendment that eliminates the reporting requirements for all small businesses. To plug the fiscal hole created by exempting small businesses from onerous 1099 reporting, Sen. Johanns wants to cut $15 billion in government spending.

While neither amendment received enough support to pass, they are indicative of the ongoing debate between Republicans and Democrats. A rejuvenated Republican Party has pledged to cut spending and reduce the size and scope of government. The Democratic Party, seemingly incapable of trimming America’s $3.7 trillion annual budget, looks to tax America’s most productive businesses to pay for its policies.

The Nelson amendment would have repealed the Section 199 tax deduction for America’s five largest oil and natural gas producers. Enacted in 2004 to foster domestic job creation and economic growth, Section 199 allows companies to deduct a portion of the income that they derive from domestic production and manufacturing activities.

Section 199 is not unique to oil and natural gas producers — as many opponents of the rule claim — any domestic manufacturer may employ this tax credit. Democrats have long been coveting the revenue a full repeal of Section 199 for energy companies would bring — Obama included the measure in his budget and congressional Democrats often cite it as a way to pay for their programs.

The oil and natural gas industry directly or indirectly employs 9.2 million Americans and adds over a trillion dollars of wealth to the American economy each year. Further taxing oil and natural gas producers will only lead to higher energy prices and fewer jobs — neither result is desirable, especially during the current economic climate.

Instead of solving the self-induced 1099 problem created by rushing healthcare legislation through Congress, Democrats resorted to their default policy: raising taxes.

Conversely, Republicans offered a tough but necessary solution: reducing spending. No matter how hard Democrats in Congress try, it will be impossible to raise taxes enough to cover the amount of money they are spending.

Federal tax revenues have averaged approximately 18 percent of GDP since 1970. According to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), tax revenues over the next decade will climb back to this historical average — even if all tax hikes are avoided. According to CBO, federal spending will exceed this level for the entire decade, averaging 23 percent of GDP, leaving a five percent gap between spending and collected revenue.

Democrats’ innate tax-hiking tendencies reveal themselves when they talk about raising taxes on the top two percent of earners come January, supposedly to pay down the deficit — another problem they created through the stimulus, the auto bailout, and other expensive programs.

After running up the Treasury’s tab by increasing spending by over twenty percent since 2008, Democrats are claiming to have found some religion. Their solution to “the deficit,” predictably, is to raise taxes on America’s most productive earners and only pay lip service to reducing spending.

Tuesday’s amendment skirmish provides the perfect lens through which to view America’s two parties. Democrats and Republicans have coalesced around the ideologies personified by Sen. Nelson’s and Sen. Johanns’ 1099 solutions. The choice for voters could not be clearer.

© 2014 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Copy Shortlink
Around the Web
Join the Newsmax Community
>> Register to share your comments with the community.
>> Login if you are already a member.
blog comments powered by Disqus
Retype Email:
Zip Code:
Hot Topics
Follow Newsmax
Like us
on Facebook
Follow us
on Twitter
Add us
on Google Plus
Around the Web
You May Also Like

Obama Has Proposed 442 Tax Increases

Tuesday, 15 Apr 2014 08:34 AM

In addition to the 442 tax increases in his annual budget proposals, the 20 signed into law as part of Obamacare, and th . . .

Tax Relief Underway in Wisconsin

Tuesday, 25 Mar 2014 10:37 AM

Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker signed Senate Bill 1 on Monday, legislation that provides $504 million in tax relief over th . . .

A Report on Taxes in Ohio

Thursday, 13 Mar 2014 10:27 AM

Ohio Governor John Kasich has unveiled his Mid-Biennium Review (MBR) and the best that could be said about it is that it . . .

Newsmax, Moneynews, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, NewsmaxWorld, NewsmaxHealth, are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved