US: Afghan Support at Risk If Security Pact Delayed Further

Wednesday, 04 Dec 2013 07:35 AM

 

  Comment  |
   Contact  |
  Print   |
    A   A  
  Copy Shortlink
WASHINGTON — Global support for Afghanistan will fade the longer President Hamid Karzai delays signing a security pact with the United States, a senior U.S. official warned, as special envoy James Dobbins arrived in Kabul on Wednesday for talks with the government.

Frustration is mounting in Washington, and among NATO allies, over Karzai's refusal to sign a bilateral security agreement (BSA), intended to shape the U.S. military presence in the country beyond 2014.

After an assembly of Afghan elders, called a Loya Jirga, endorsed the pact last month, Karzai surprised the international community when he said he might not sign the deal until after elections in April.

That would hold up vital military planning for a post-2014 mission.

A series of discussions between U.S. and Afghan officials have been held since, to seek an end to the impasse. Dobbins arrived in Kabul as part of that effort, although the U.S. Embassy there declined to say if he would meet Karzai.

"The longer this goes on the more that international support will erode," the U.S. official told Reuters in Washington. "It is quite clear to us that the delay in signing this agreement is adding tremendous uncertainty to an already uncertain environment in Afghanistan."

The official said Dobbins' visit to Kabul was part of regular consultations in the region, but the security pact would be raised.

The United States was now at pains to explain to Afghan officials, both publicly and privately, the political and related economic cost of prolonged uncertainty if the deal was not quickly signed, the official added.

Also at stake are billions of dollars in foreign assistance if donors worry about the future of development projects.

Secretary of State John Kerry Tuesday suggested that Afghanistan's defense minister or other senior government officials could also sign the pact.

The State Department official denied this was a way of bypassing Karzai.

"The agreement could either be signed by President Karzai or someone he designates, just as on our side an executive agreement could be signed by the president or a Cabinet officer, or an ambassador."

© 2014 Thomson/Reuters. All rights reserved.

  Comment  |
   Contact  |
  Print   |
  Copy Shortlink
Around the Web
Join the Newsmax Community
Please review Community Guidelines before posting a comment.
>> Register to share your comments with the community.
>> Login if you are already a member.
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
Email:
Country
Zip Code:
Privacy: We never share your email.
 
Follow Newsmax
Like us
on Facebook
Follow us
on Twitter
Add us
on Google Plus
Around the Web
Top Stories
You May Also Like

US Leads 22 More Air Strikes Against Islamic State

Monday, 22 Dec 2014 08:55 AM

The U.S.-led coalition conducted 12 air strikes against Islamic State militants in Syria on Monday and 10 strikes Iraq,  . . .

Pope Francis: Vatican Brass Diseased With Power and Greed

Monday, 22 Dec 2014 08:45 AM

The Vatican's top administrators would have been expecting an exchange of pleasantries at their annual Christmas meeting . . .

North Korea Skipping UN Security Council Meeting

Monday, 22 Dec 2014 08:42 AM

An angry North Korea, now on the defensive over a U.S. accusation of hacking, is refusing to take part in a groundbreaki . . .

Most Commented

Newsmax, Moneynews, Newsmax Health, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, and Newsmax World are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

 
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved