Login or Register
Welcome , Settings |  Logout

'Zero Dark Thirty' Explores Boundaries

Thursday, 24 Jan 2013 11:06 PM

By George Will

Share:
More . . .
A    A   |
   Email Us   |
   Print   |
"I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under the blanket of the very freedom that I provide, and then questions the manner in which I provide it."
— Col. Nathan Jessep to Lt. Daniel Kaffee from "A Few Good Men" (1992)
 
 "You," said Jack Nicholson's Jessep to Tom Cruise's Kaffee, "have the luxury of not knowing what I know." Viewers of the movie "Zero Dark Thirty" will, according to some informed persons, lose the luxury of not knowing about hard but morally defensible things done on their behalf.
 
Other informed persons, however, say viewers will be misled because the movie intimates (actually it is ambiguous about this) a crucial role of "enhanced interrogation" in extracting information useful to tracking Osama bin Laden.
 
In "A Few Good Men," Col. Jessep insists that a harsh — and proscribed — training method ("Code Red") saves lives: "You [expletive deleted] people . . . you have no idea how to defend a nation." "Zero Dark Thirty" explores the boundaries of the permissible when defending not a nation but this nation.
 
Viewers will know going in how the movie ends. They will not know how they will feel when seeing an American tell a detainee, "When you lie to me I hurt you," and proceed to do so.

The movie, which is primarily about CIA operatives, probably will make at least a cameo appearance in the confirmation hearings for Barack Obama's nominee as the next CIA director, John Brennan. His 25 years with the CIA included the years when "enhanced interrogation" was used to squeeze crucial information from suspected terrorists.

Sen. Dianne Feinstein, chair of the intelligence committee, and two colleagues have denounced the movie as "grossly inaccurate and misleading" for its "suggestion" that torture produced information that led to locating bin Laden.
 
But former CIA Director Michael Hayden, while saying "there is no way to confirm" that information obtained by "enhanced interrogation" was the "decisive" intelligence in locating bin Laden, insists that such information "helped" lead to bin Laden.

Former Attorney General Michael Mukasey goes further: Khalid Sheik Mohammed "broke like a dam" under harsh techniques, including waterboarding, and his "torrent of information" included "the nickname of a trusted courier of bin Laden," perhaps the one who is central to the movie's narrative.

In 2007, Hayden ended the use of half the "enhanced interrogation" techniques, including waterboarding, because American law, our understanding of the threat and our sources of information had changed. He also says, however, that such interrogations produced half our knowledge of al-Qaida's structure and activities.

"In the end, everybody breaks, bro — it's biology," says the CIA man in the movie, tactically but inaccurately, to the detainee undergoing "enhanced interrogation." This too-familiar term has lost its capacity for making us uneasy. America's Vietnam failure was foretold when U.S. officials began calling air attacks on North Vietnam "protective reaction strikes," a semantic obfuscation that revealed moral queasiness.
 
"The great enemy of clear language is insincerity," wrote George Orwell, who warned about governments resorting to "long words and exhausted idioms, like a cuttlefish spurting out ink."

Viewers of "Zero Dark Thirty" can decide whether or which "enhanced interrogation" measures depicted — slaps, sleep deprivation, humiliation, waterboarding — constitute, in plain English, torture. And they can ponder whether any or all of them would be wrong even if effective.

Mukasey says the phrase "enhanced interrogation techniques" is "so absurdly antiseptic as to imply that it must conceal something unlawful." Such "harsh techniques" were, he says, used against fewer than one-third of the fewer than 100 "hardcore prisoners" in CIA custody.

The government properly cooperated with the making of this movie because the public needs realism about the world we live in. "We live," says Col. Jessep, "in a world that has walls . . . You want me on that wall, you need me on that wall." Regarding terrorism, the problem is that we live in a world without walls, without ramparts that can be manned for the purpose of repelling an invasion by a massed enemy.

When the CIA woman who drives the pursuit of bin Laden is about to enter, for the first time, the room where "enhanced interrogation" is administered, the CIA man who administers it tells her, "There's no shame if you want to watch from the monitor." She, however, knows, and viewers of "Zero Dark Thirty" will understand, it is best to look facts, including choices, in the face.
 
George F. Will is one of today's most recognized writers, with more than 450 newspapers, a Newsweek column, and his appearances as a political commentator on ABC. Read more reports from George Will — Click Here Now.
 


 
 

© 2013 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

Share:
More . . .
   Email Us   |
   Print   |
Around the Web
Join the Newsmax Community
>> Register to share your comments with the community.
>> Login if you are already a member.
blog comments powered by n class="logo-disqus"> Disqus
 
Email:
Country
Zip Code:
 
Hot Topics
Top Stories
Around the Web
You May Also Like

The NLRB's School Door Stand

Thursday, 23 May 2013 11:41 AM

Early in an opinion issued recently by a unanimous three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Co . . .

Trust in Obama Is Tapped Out

Wednesday, 22 May 2013 10:07 AM

Leaving aside the seriousness of lawlessness, and the corruption of our civic culture by the professionally pious, this  . . .

Forgetting Watergate's Lesson

Wednesday, 15 May 2013 16:15 PM

The burglary occurred in 1972, the climax came in 1974, but 40 years ago this week — May 17, 1973 — the Senate Watergate . . .

 
 
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved