Tags: Question | Frugality | Age | Excess

A Question of Frugality in the Age of Excess

Image: A Question of Frugality in the Age of Excess
Troy Wuelfing | Dreamstime.com

By
Friday, 19 May 2017 01:56 PM Current | Bio | Archive

In an earlier time, under the influence of the traditional Christian ethic, virtue assumed a divine quality.

Among these principles was thrift, honored for its own sake.

I recall a popular tale about the wife of a man of extremely modest means whose food shopping consisted of selecting the lowest priced items from numerous markets. Naturally she walked from store to store – or perhaps "trudged," to add a touch of pathos. In any event, the story served its purpose. It illustrated a frugality next to godliness, with no limit to the exaltation experienced in such behavior.

Things have changed. A recent report reveals that over half a group surveyed refuses to pick up a penny on the ground. Speaking for myself, I’ll never pass one by. Perhaps it relates to my recollections as a teen-aged bowling alley pin setter earning a dime a line. A penny represents resetting of ten wooden pins and returning two 16-pound balls. To this day that cent signifies a reward for services rendered. Are my experiences unique?  It’s hard to say whether this attitude is generational or individual. Regardless, there is more to the wise use of money than mere bargain hunting. A personal consideration transcends the ordinary analysis of value – I call it marginal benefits of economy. Let me explain.

There is a term taught in first year Economics known as marginal utility of money. The principle is easily illustrated.  Consider the case of Bea Reft, annual salary $30,000, who receives a $5,000 increase. Her life is measurably improved. She can now eat out a little more often, join the neighborhood health club and buy that pair of unaffordable black Amalfi pumps. Contrast that with Greta Gotrocks, earning $175,000 per year, who likewise receives a $5,000 pay increase. Compared with her standard of living before, that relatively small additional amount is meaningless. The likelihood is Greta will never notice the difference.

In concept, marginal benefits of economy is akin to marginal utility of money in that the perceived benefit from an expenditure relates to financial status. Several factors, foremost among them cash flow and net worth, interact to determine the relative value of parsimony. The more prosperous a person becomes, the less meaningful the benefit from a cost-conscious economic decision. If the 9-month old car radio of Horace F. Rugle, a janitor earning $600 per week, malfunctions, he should invoke his warranty despite the fact that he must do without for the four weeks it will take for the radio to be reinstalled. However, if the same misfortune befalls John P. Rosperous, a $250,000 per year title company executive, he may ignore the warranty, buy a new car radio for $200 and install it at once. The pleasure of listening to the radio for those four weeks provides a greater marginal benefit to him than the price he pays. Similarly, at the extreme, Michael Bloomberg was fully justified in spending sixty million dollars for the pleasure of becoming mayor of New York. There’s probably no way he might have spent discretionary dollars more enjoyably. 

Finally, consider another principle running counter to our marginal benefits principle, that of diminishing returns. Although the actual law of diminishing returns formulated in the eighteenth century pertained to a relationship between input and output of productive resources, the concept can be expanded to relate to an individual's personal expenditures. As an illustration, a pair of stereo speakers faithfully reproducing sound over the frequency range 30 to 16,000 hertz (cycles per second) costs $250. By employing the ultimate in design and manufacturing techniques, this expands to the range of the human ear, 20 to 20,000 hertz, but the sales price increases to $2,500. As the difference in listening quality is slight at best, the extra price paid for the more expensive pair is clearly an example of diminishing returns. 

In short, your conduct as a consumer relates to what you find important in life. With limited resources, but aspirations for the future, base your choices on thrift and discipline.

As the years pass and net worth increases, modify your conduct accordingly, but keep in mind that these must be deliberate choices. Don’t let advertising pressures or market manipulators preempt these decisions.

A professional investor for nearly five decades, Al Jacobs holds a degree in civil engineering from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, a Real Estate Certificate from the University of California and a Certified Property Manager designation (CPM) from the Institute of Real Estate Management. His written works can be found in the book "Roadway to Prosperity: A Practical Guide to Wealth Accumulation" and also in several newspapers near his hometown of Monarch Beach in Orange County, Calif. Jacobs writes a weekly column for his website.

© 2017 Newsmax Finance. All rights reserved.

 
1Like our page
2Share
AlJacobs
Your conduct as a consumer relates to what you find important in life. With limited resources, but aspirations for the future, base your choices on thrift and discipline.
Question, Frugality, Age, Excess
788
2017-56-19
Friday, 19 May 2017 01:56 PM
Newsmax Inc.
 

Newsmax, Moneynews, Newsmax Health, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, and Newsmax World are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

NEWSMAX.COM
MONEYNEWS.COM
© Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved