The Role of 'Sole Military Adviser'

Tuesday, 23 Jul 2013 10:07 AM

By Susan Estrich

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
|  A   A  
  Copy Shortlink
It's not often that a testy exchange at a hearing, followed by a senator's statement that he would put a hold on the nomination until he got an adequate answer to his question, opens a window to a fundamental issue in our democracy. And a timely one.
 
Two days after brokering a deal to avoid the senatorial "nuclear option" — an effort by the majority to strip the minority of their filibuster rights by agreeing to a compromise that in grade school might win you an extra few minutes of recess and in Washington leads to accolades of utter disbelief at such good will — Sen. John McCain announced that he intended to put a hold on the nomination of Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Martin Dempsey to serve another two-year term.
 
The reason was Dempsey's refusal to answer McCain's question — or rather, to give him the kind of answer he wanted.
 
The question was this: "Do you believe the continued costs and risks of our inaction in Syria are now worse for our national security interests than the costs and risks associated with limited military action?"
 
The answer was this: "I am in favor of building a moderate opposition and supporting it. The question whether to support it with direct kinetic strikes is a decision for our elected officials, not for the senior military leader of the nation."
 
In other words, it is the president's decision whether to use military force, and the man McCain called his "sole military adviser" refused to say what option the military favored.
 
In this instance, it is clear why McCain was so frustrated. He went to Syria and met with the rebel forces. McCain favors stronger military action. He is looking for (and maybe believes he has, if he were to speak freely) a supporter and an ally in Dempsey, a voice at the table advocating for and not merely explaining the military option.
 
He is frustrated that the most powerful military man in the United States is so careful, reticent, reluctant to throw his power around.
 
Imagine that.
 
Talk about a miracle.
 
I'm not arguing that civilian control of the military ultimately turns on how Dempsey frames his analysis of the military options in Syria. Indeed, Armed Services Committee Chairman Sen. Carl Levin seemed to have come up with a compromise by the end, when he announced that the general would return in the future to discuss with the committee the pros, cons, and costs. Said Levin: "If you'll do that, it may be a step that would be a constructive, positive step."
 
I expect he will do that. I expect this particular dispute will be resolved.
 
But the fact that it could be a dispute at all is one of those minor miracles of democracy and the rule of law that is easy to forget in our collective disgust with the day-to-day operations of our government.
 
We live in a country where the most powerful military man actually (if you share McCain's view) has to be encouraged to take a strong position on whether the nation should resort to a military option.
 
Name one other country in the world where that is a "problem."
 
Meanwhile, a majority in the Senate was in fact able to craft a deal to address the problem of stalled nominees (for as long as two years), which should not have been a problem in the first place. But, hey, we are still talking about Washington, D.C., in 2013.
 
Susan Estrich is a best-selling author whose writings have appeared in newspapers such as The New York Times, Los Angeles Times, and Washington Post, and she has been a commentator on countless TV news programs. Read more reports from Susan Estrich — Click Here Now.
 
 
 

© Creators Syndicate Inc.

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
  Copy Shortlink
Around the Web
Join the Newsmax Community
>> Register to share your comments with the community.
>> Login if you are already a member.
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
Email:
Retype Email:
Country
Zip Code:
 
Hot Topics
Follow Newsmax
Like us
on Facebook
Follow us
on Twitter
Add us
on Google Plus
Around the Web
You May Also Like

Senate Politicizes Judicial Nominations

Friday, 18 Apr 2014 10:55 AM

With luck, Michelle Friedland, a highly qualified appointee to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, . . .

Obamacare Needs to Be Fixed

Wednesday, 16 Apr 2014 08:52 AM

Obamacare should not be repealed, and it won't be. But it needs to be fixed. . . .

The Abortion Fight 40 Years Later

Wednesday, 02 Apr 2014 15:14 PM

It has been more than 40 years since the United States Supreme Court held in Roe v. Wade that a woman, in consultation w . . .

Newsmax, Moneynews, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, NewsmaxWorld, NewsmaxHealth, are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

 
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved