Let's Change the Culture of Congress

Monday, 25 Oct 2010 03:29 PM

By Ernest Istook

  Comment  |
   Contact  |
  Print  
|  A   A  
  Copy Shortlink
Changing the membership of the Congress does not fix its out-of-touch culture.

Congress’ immense unpopularity reflects the need for fundamental change in how it operates. The Heritage Foundation is proposing four immediate changes — starting at the top. The proposals would restore more power to rank-and-file members of the House of Representatives, who currently yield too much to party leaders.

The goal is to strengthen the constitutional design of “the people’s House,” whereby power is intended to function from the bottom up, not the current top-down system.

Heritage’s proposal is entitled “Four Immediate Reforms to Change the Culture of Congress.”

Authority should be spread more broadly rather than the current concentration of power with the speaker and other party leaders.

It is through party rules of the Democrat caucus and the Republican conference that the committees — which are the official House organization — are brought under control of party leaders. Decisions on this system are set to occur the week of Nov. 15, long before the new Congress gathers in January.

The Heritage proposal would change what elections cannot. Elections alter who runs the House, but cannot address how it is run.

The underlying system has pushed that body out of touch with the American people. The tenure of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., has demonstrated the danger of the current system that concentrates too much power in the hands of too few political party leaders in Congress.

Speaker Pelosi exemplifies what can be done with this accumulated authority, brandishing it to coerce or cajole members into voting for the non-stimulative stimulus bill, enacting the unwieldy and unaffordable healthcare law, approving massive deficits, and preventing meaningful options from being considered.

She bypassed the nominal House rules with impunity to produce enormous and ill-reviewed legislation. Plus she has used her authority to blockade the relief needed from massive tax hikes set to occur next year.

Current party rules give party leaders excessive leverage over committee and chairmanship appointments in general, and major slots in particular.

The key is that each party’s Steering Committee, which nominally makes many of those appointments, is designed with weighted votes to be dominated by party leaders.

Despite dominating their Steering Committees, party leaders make other key appointments directly and bypass the Steering Committees.

The head of each party — not the Steering Committee — selects who serves on the “select” and “joint” committees. And other key positions also are personal appointments by party leaders.

The Rules Committee controls what can or cannot be considered on the House floor, including both legislation and amendments.

As its own website proclaims, the Rules Committee functions as an “arm of the leadership” rather than being accountable to the entire Congress. Currently, the rules of each party give the speaker and minority leader personal control over all members of the Rules Committee. Changing that would change the entire system of legislation.

For example, House Republican Conference Rules 12 and 13 grant sole appointive power to their potential speaker-designee over the chairs and all GOP members of the Rules Committee, the Administration Committee, and all select and joint committees of the House.

Likewise, the speaker and minority leader have a personal lock on who serves on the House Administration Committee, which handles operations and budgeting within the House and how resources of funds, space, and staff are allocated or denied to members.

Heritage’s proposal (online here) is a useful guide to how this party-run system operates now and how it should be corrected to make the House more responsive to the will of the American people.

An extra benefit from these reforms might be a less partisan Congress, increasing the ability of members to work across party lines to seek solutions, as they would be less beholden to party leaders.

Citizens have been complaining that Congress needs to be more responsive to the public, and less controlled by Washington’s ways. This proposal is a solid first step.

Ernest Istook served 14 years as a U.S. congressman and is now a distinguished fellow at The Heritage Foundation.



© 2014 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

  Comment  |
   Contact  |
  Print  
  Copy Shortlink
Around the Web
Join the Newsmax Community
Please review Community Guidelines before posting a comment.
>> Register to share your comments with the community.
>> Login if you are already a member.
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
Email:
Country
Zip Code:
Privacy: We never share your email.
 
Hot Topics
Follow Newsmax
Like us
on Facebook
Follow us
on Twitter
Add us
on Google Plus
Around the Web
Top Stories
You May Also Like

Obamacare's Nearly Bottomless Slush Fund

Thursday, 20 Jun 2013 17:40 PM

Should our tax dollars be spent to hire the National Basketball Association to promote Obamacare? Congress has created a . . .

Is NSA Whistle-Blower Snowden a Hero?

Monday, 10 Jun 2013 14:38 PM

Hero? Or villain? Edward Snowden leaked secrets about government tracking of phone calls, emails and more. It's too earl . . .

Hold Our Jihad Enablers Accountable

Friday, 26 Apr 2013 08:54 AM

Punishing terrorists isn't enough. That's just an after-the-attack response. We should condemn those who push a false se . . .

Most Commented

Newsmax, Moneynews, Newsmax Health, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, and Newsmax World are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

 
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved