Login or Register
Welcome , Settings |  Logout

NYT: Debt Ceiling Extension Doesn’t End Crisis

Friday, 25 Jan 2013 03:24 AM

By Michael Kling

Share:
More . . .
A    A   |
   Email Us   |
   Print   |
Some investors may have breathed a sigh of relief after the House of Representatives passed a bill to extend the debt ceiling for three months, postponing a fight that might have roiled financial markets and damaged the country’s credit rating.

Yet the 90-day extension does not help the market and does not end the crisis, argues The New York Times in an editorial.

“Postponing a crisis for 90 days does nothing to reassure markets, or businesses or ordinary bondholders worried about their investments,” The Times states.

Editor's Note: The ‘Unthinkable’ Could Happen — Wall Street Journal. Prepare for Meltdown

The temporary extension, according to the newspaper, also does not increase voters’ confidence that Congress will deal with the budget in a serious way.

“[The] bill doesn’t even raise the ceiling. It simply suspends its enforcement, showing how meaningless the mechanism is,” The Times says.

“Now that it is clear that the ceiling can be easily eliminated, both parties should agree to do so, averting not just this crisis, but all those in the future.”

House Republicans say they want spending cuts to equal increases in the debt limit, but have yet to propose what to cut. A balanced budget would mean drastic cuts to Medicare and Medicaid and other popular programs.

At least the postponement will match the debt ceiling debate to the annual budget approval timeframe. “Let each chamber put its policy priorities on the table for public examination,” The Times states, “and then hash out the differences in the full glare of the C-Span cameras.”

Other commentators and experts also argue that the debt ceiling limit should be eliminated, not simply raised.

In fact, 84 percent of the 38 economists participating in a University of Chicago survey agreed that a debt ceiling limit only creates unneeded uncertainty and can lead to worse fiscal outcomes, the Los Angeles Times reports.

“Separating out the spending from the actual payment for the spending is just a reckless fiscal policy,” said Jacob Funk Kirkegaard, a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, according to the Times.

Editor's Note: The ‘Unthinkable’ Could Happen — Wall Street Journal. Prepare for Meltdown

© 2013 Moneynews. All rights reserved.

Share:
More . . .
   Email Us   |
   Print   |
Around the Web
Join the Newsmax Community
>> Register to share your comments with the community.
>> Login if you are already a member.
blog comments powered by n class="logo-disqus"> Disqus
 
Email:
Country
Zip Code:
 
Hot Topics
Top Stories
Around the Web
You May Also Like

Asia Ramps up Debt, While US, Europe Retrench

Friday, 24 May 2013 11:09 AM

Asia is taking on a major debt load at the same time the United States and Europe are deleveraging, leading some to worr . . .

Sequester Makes Holiday Weekend Longer for Govt Employees

Friday, 24 May 2013 11:01 AM

About 115,000 federal workers across four agencies are having to take an unpaid day off Friday, turning their Memorial D . . .

Pierpoint Economist: Growth Yet to Show 'Rip-Roaring Strength'

Friday, 24 May 2013 10:28 AM

Orders for long-lasting manufactured goods rose more than expected in April, a hopeful sign that a contraction in factor . . .

 
 
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved