Tags: vaccine | stem | cell

What Everyone Should Know About Vaccines

Thursday, 17 Oct 2013 11:52 AM

By Alveda King

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
|  A   A  
  Copy Shortlink
“I will give thanks to You, for I am fearfully and wonderfully made; wonderful are Your works, and my soul knows it very well.”
—Psalm 139:4

While I definitely haven’t read the huge file of the HHS' Affordable Health Care Act, I’m wondering where vaccines and stem cell research fit in with this overhaul, which is at the core of the recent government shutdown.

Often when I tell people that stem cell therapy and vaccines for babies, international travel, and other reasons sometimes contain human DNA from hosts, they accuse me of sensationalism. They definitely don’t want to hear that Planned Parenthood and other eugenicists are up on the “ins and outs” of this “hidden in plain sight” information.

At soundchoice.org and http://www.vaccinetruth.org/genetic_code.htm there is genuine evidence that vaccines sometimes include fetal DNA.

As we begin to connect some dots and ask pertinent questions, we can wonder if through vaccines, are DNA links to various conditions and behaviors transmitted as well? In other words, a baby may not be created, conceived or fertilized with certain proclivities towards say high blood pressure, diabetes, sexual issues, etc.; but once born and vaccinated they may “inherit” some otherwise not “bred” conditions.

Please see excerpts below, from Vaccines and Production of Negative Genetic Changes in Humans, 1996-1998 Leading Edge Research Group.

"One of the indications that vaccinations may in fact be changing the genetic structure of humans became evident in September of 1971, when scientists at the University of Geneva made the discovery that biological substances entering directly into the bloodstream could become part of human genetic structure.

"Originally, Japanese bacteriologists discovered that bacteria of one species transferred their own specific antibiotic resistance to bacteria of an entirely different species. Dr. Maurice Stroun and Dr. Philip Anker in the Department of Plant Physiology at the University of Geneva, began to accumulate evidence that the transfer of genetic information is not confined to bacteria, but can also occur between bacteria and higher plants and animals.

"According to an article in World Medicine on September 22, 1971, 'Geneva scientists are convinced that normal animal and plant cells shed DNA, and that this DNA is taken up by other cells in the organism.'"

Dr. Theresa Deisher, current president and CEO at AVM Biotechnology writes: “When pharmaceutical companies switched from using animal cell lines to using aborted human fetal cells lines to produce these vaccines, in the mid to late 1970s, they assumed, without any evidence, that using aborted fetal cells would result in a more efficient production system.

"Brief discussions about potential adverse health consequences of using aborted human cell lines for vaccine production were captured in minutes from FDA advisory meetings about this switch. However, no studies have been done to actually measure the extent of those potential adverse consequences.

"Vaccines and biologics (engineered proteins as drugs) are too large to make in a test tube, so companies harness the normal machinery used to make these, cells. No final drug is ever completely ‘pure’ and you will find contaminating DNA and cellular debris from the production cell in your final product. When we switch from using animal cells to using human cells we now have human DNA in our vaccines and our drugs.”

When we consider the “law of unexpected outcomes,” we discover that with embryonic and adult stem cell intervention, vaccines and other “scientific and medical” approaches, it takes many years to truly determine whether a process or procedure will have harmful side effects.

Such is the case for example, with stem cell research and Roe v. Wade, which at its onset ignored the long term effects to a woman’s mental and physical health impacted by abortion, while it discreetly overlooked the humanity of the children in the womb.

As human beings we have the privileged advantage of being able to think and to pray. The question is, Do we still have an obligation or a desire to be informed?

© 2014 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
  Copy Shortlink
Around the Web
Join the Newsmax Community
>> Register to share your comments with the community.
>> Login if you are already a member.
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
Email:
Retype Email:
Country
Zip Code:
 
Hot Topics
Follow Newsmax
Like us
on Facebook
Follow us
on Twitter
Add us
on Google Plus
Around the Web
You May Also Like

An Open Letter to Essence Magazine

Monday, 14 Apr 2014 07:41 AM

The Rev. Arnold Culbreath and I wrote letters to Essence magazine’s expressing surprise over the magazine's handling of  . . .

Civil Rights Summit Ignored Abortion

Friday, 11 Apr 2014 14:18 PM

This week’s 2014 Civil Rights Summit missed a historic moment to acknowledge the most important civil rights struggle of . . .

Abortion Claiming Young Lives

Monday, 07 Apr 2014 14:13 PM

Lakisha Wilson is a victim of "choice," just like Tonya Reaves was in 2012 when she bled to death after an abortion at P . . .

Newsmax, Moneynews, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, NewsmaxWorld, NewsmaxHealth, are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

 
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved