Tags: Christine | O’Donnell | carl | paladino | media | bias

Judgmental Journalists Should Be Judged

Tuesday, 21 Sep 2010 11:30 AM

By Ben Stein's DREEMZ

Let's judge those who judge.

A daring idea and let me tell you how it came to me.

I was at The Rio hotel in Las Vegas watching TV. A very famous TV correspondent was interviewing a man named Mr. Carl Paladino, who is now the GOP candidate for governor of New York.

The correspondent was asking about pornographic videos that the candidate had sent around, and also about a racist comedic video that he had sent around regarding Mr. Barack Obama.

The correspondent was really giving it to Paladino. Really letting him have it, It reminded me of O’Brien, the Inner Party officer of The Thought Police in 1984 grilling Winston Smith.

The correspondent was just beating him and beating him until he caved in and apologized.

Now, one thought came to me, which was, “What does this have to do with public policy or governance?” But the real thought came a moment later.

The thought that came to me was, “Let him who is without sin among you cast the first stone.”

How interesting it would be to know by what moral authority media people give other people the third degree. I agree that when policy is being discussed, the correspondent should have free rein. But when it’s a matter of personal behavior, what gives the reporter/anchor/commentator the right to sit in judgment?

After an earlier report on a genuine psycho named Christine O’Donnell who is running for the Senate from Delaware, the network had three wise men talk about her, and they were genuinely smart men, one of whom I know extremely well.

They asked interesting questions and made good points. But what gives them the stature to judge the morality of other people on national TV? Shouldn’t we know something about their moral qualities if they are going to judge other people’s moral qualities?

Think about it: TV anchors, reporters, commentators, columnists, and editorial writers for major publications are extremely important national figures. Their opinions guide policy.

Shouldn’t we know something about them? Would it be relevant if they were carrying around the same or similar moral flaws (if they are flaws) that the political figures they castigate carry?

We would not want a judge ruling on drunk driving cases if he were a drunk, would we? Yet national journalistic figures (way above my humble level) do not have to be confirmed for their jobs by the Senate, do not have to be vetted . . . they just get co-opted by the powers that be that are already there.

My humble point: why are the Inquisitors above inquiry?

© 2015 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

Around the Web
Join the Newsmax Community
Please review Community Guidelines before posting a comment.
>> Register to share your comments with the community.
>> Login if you are already a member.
blog comments powered by Disqus
Zip Code:
Privacy: We never share your email.
Hot Topics
Follow Newsmax
Like us
on Facebook
Follow us
on Twitter
Add us
on Google Plus
Around the Web
Top Stories
You May Also Like

Ode to Korean War Hero

Wednesday, 28 Jan 2015 10:46 AM

I think I am safe in saying that it was the determination of men like Bob Denman and all who fought with him in Korea th . . .

Obama's Political Charade Divides Nation, Incites Anger

Thursday, 22 Jan 2015 15:43 PM

Mr. Obama’s theatrics are a carnival sideshow, designed to appeal to the Elizabeth Warren College of Envy. . . .

Obama Sticks It to the GOP in His Address

Wednesday, 21 Jan 2015 10:34 AM

He wants to make a kinder, gentler politics in America. He sticks it to the Republicans any chance he gets, . . .

Most Commented

Newsmax, Moneynews, Newsmax Health, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, and Newsmax World are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved