Debt Is Our Entitlement

Thursday, 10 Jan 2013 10:51 AM

By Armstrong Williams

  Comment  |
   Contact  |
  Print   |
    A   A  
  Copy Shortlink
Sometimes, looking at the political discourse in this country, I wonder if we really understand the ratchet effect of increasing government programs and power over time: unlike in business, unlike in nature, unlike in, well, real life, failure is not punished, but at best ignored, at worst rewarded.

Once a program is in place, it is almost never repealed, even when Republicans obtain political power because voters become dependent on it.

Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Calif., famously said it would be worth losing a few members of Congress to get Obamacare passed.
(AP Photo)
Progressives have known this for as long as they have been blowing up the bureaucracy. Congressman Henry Waxman famously said that, if it took losing a few members of Congress in the next election to get Obamacare passed, it would be worth it. And this was no partisan bias: Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell agreed, warning his troops that once an entitlement is given, it is nearly impossible to get it back.

Franklin Delano Roosevelt knew this way ahead of those two men. He proudly said it in introducing Social Security, that since all paid taxes for it, all had a skin in the game — all were invested in keeping it going.

That’s how Ponzi schemes work: eventually someone gets left with the bill, so everyone tries to keep it going as long as possible. It’s like musical chairs: eventually the music will stop, and someone will lose. The game is all about avoiding being that person.

In nature, when a gazelle is weak, he is eaten by a lion, taken from the pack. When a branch of a tree is weak, it breaks and other, stronger limbs continue in their strength. When a business fails to make resources more valuable, then it goes bankrupt and is, effectively, killed off. This is how the free market works; this is how real life works.

It’s interesting, then, that a November 2011 Wall Street Journal poll indicates that 60 percent of Americans believe that the current structure of the economy favors a small portion of the rich over the rest of us. And surely they are right: the government is radically warping the market.

There is no free market, at least not anymore.

Why do we ignore the tone of Obama’s class warfare (taxes on only the top 2 percent) and anti-free market (“you didn’t build that”) rhetoric? He is making mainstream what has never been so in America.

Obama clearly has a commitment to state controlled communalism as opposed to mere protection of individual rights and freedom. He believes that the state should control individuals in society rather than individuals in society controlling the state.

I’m not picking on the president: he got elected by tens of millions of Americans! What I’m concerned about is that lots of people agree with him!

The president is not a socialist. However, he is a statist. The current term for this is crony capitalism. He does not want the state to own the means of production and the assets in economy, but he wants the state to control the economy indirectly, through regulation for the benefit of the “friends” of the state: the private sector still owns businesses and assumes business risks, but the government tells individuals and businesses who to hire, what to pay, what to make, how to invest, and how much to pay the government in tribute for its “protection.”

Much like in a casino, the house always wins. The government plays with house money, and there’s just no competing with that. This, in turn, has an unsubtle impact on the way the government is run and the policies that are implemented, as the cronies’ special treatment is reinforced with their success.

What do progressives do when a government program fails? Add on another program. Modify the program. Expand it. No one punishes a government program with spending cuts. Bad programs get more money, so each program is incentivized to fail, much as welfare recipients are paid to fail. If they succeed, the money is cut off.

How much further can we ratchet up the spending in this country? We have an enormous bureaucracy, but the problem is so much worse than that; as bad as it is, discretionary spending is a tiny percentage of our budget.

The only thing we’re entitled to now is debt.

Armstrong Williams is an African-American political commentator who writes a conservative newspaper column, hosts a nationally syndicated TV program called “The Right Side,” and hosts a daily radio show on Sirius/XM Power 128 (7-8 p.m. and 4-5 a.m.) Monday through Friday. Read more reports from Armstrong Williams — Click Here Now.

© 2014 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

  Comment  |
   Contact  |
  Print   |
  Copy Shortlink
Around the Web
Join the Newsmax Community
Please review Community Guidelines before posting a comment.
>> Register to share your comments with the community.
>> Login if you are already a member.
blog comments powered by Disqus
Zip Code:
Privacy: We never share your email.
Follow Newsmax
Like us
on Facebook
Follow us
on Twitter
Add us
on Google Plus
Around the Web
Top Stories
You May Also Like

Improve Public Health With Return to Basic Food

Tuesday, 09 Dec 2014 13:20 PM

Your food is your medicine if it enhances your health; but it can actually be a poison if we consume things that destroy . . .

Rest in Peace, Marion Barry

Tuesday, 02 Dec 2014 11:43 AM

The everyday citizen who may have been down on her luck could relate to Barry’s flaws. In a sense, being who he was in t . . .

Hispanic Racism Goes Unreported

Tuesday, 18 Nov 2014 09:41 AM

As Latin American immigrants continue to flood the United States, both legally and illegally, discrimination against Afr . . .

Most Commented

Newsmax, Moneynews, Newsmax Health, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, and Newsmax World are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved